Spanking Has Negative Effect on Intelligence

Research States Corporal Punishment Stunts I.Q.

© Barbara Pytel

Oct 5, 2009
Spanking Damages a Child's Brain, Pink Sherbet Photography
The consensus of a team of New Hampshire researchers is to never spank a child under any circumstances.

Murray Straus, a sociologist, and Mallie Paschall from the Prevention Research Center in Berkeley, California, led a research study that shows spanking lowers a child’s IQ.

Corporal Punishment by Parents

Spare the rod and spoil the child is often stated by parents to justify spanking. But, could spanking actually be damaging to a child’s ability to learn? New research says yes, it could.

Spanking that leaves a mark may be considered physical child abuse in many states and could result in a parent losing parental rights and even going to jail. But, spanking may also affect children in their ability to learn in school. Murray Straus, leader of the recent University of New Hampshire in Durham study, says, "The practical side of this is that pediatricians and child psychologists need to start doing what none of them do now, and say, ‘Never spank under any circumstances.’" [1]

Spanked Children Have Less Gray Matter

While several studies in the past have alluded to the fact that spanking may reduce intelligence, this new study proclaims it as fact. Spanking creates stress, anxiety and fear and this can slow a child’s cognitive development. It can actually result in fewer neurons in the brain.

The New Hampshire study examined children over a four-year period and divided them into two age groups: 2 to 4 years old and 5 to 9 years old. This was to measure the damage based on age because some psychologists state that spanking does no damage when children are younger. IQ tests were administered as a pretest.

The mothers were questioned on how often they spanked their children. It was revealed that 93% of mothers had spanked younger children once or more per week. 58% had spanked toddlers three or more times a week. A large portion of mothers spanked older children less.

Four years later, the IQ test was administered again. Younger children that had never been spanked scored 5.5 points higher than their spanked peers. In the older age group, the unspanked gained an average of 2 IQ points over the spanked group. The conclusion was made that younger children suffer more damage when spanked.

"It is one of the cruel ironies that younger children are more at risk because their brain is in the most formative part of development," says Straus.

Cognitive Stimulation Is a Factor in Intelligence

The study had a strange twist to it. If a mother gives a child cognitive stimulation in addition to some spanking, the damage to the brain does not seem to be there. Straus says, "Let’s say you have a child that comes from educated parents, warm and supportive parents, who provide cognitive stimulation, and they spank: that kid’s going to be OK anyhow, [though] maybe not quite as OK [as the child would be] if they didn’t spank." [1]

Corporal Punishment by Schools

This now raises the issue of corporal punishment in schools. How can a school justify corporal punishment even with parental permission? Is school not the place for learning to take place? Why create an environment that causes stress, anxiety and fear which reduces the ability to learn?

Hopefully, psychologists and pediatricians will now change their stance on permitting spanking by parents. The evidence is now available to support the elimination of spanking.

Related article: Spanking and Deviate Behaviors

[1] Callaway, Ewen."Smacking Hits Kids’ IQ: Corporal Punishments Stunt Children’s Intelligence, Research Shows," abcnews.go.com, Sept. 27, 2009.


The copyright of the article Spanking Has Negative Effect on Intelligence in Educational Issues is owned by Barbara Pytel. Permission to republish Spanking Has Negative Effect on Intelligence in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.


Spanking Damages a Child's Brain, Pink Sherbet Photography
       


Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo

Comments
Oct 12, 2009 9:26 AM
Guest :
Not true -- as a mother and a teacher -- of very bright kids who are very successful adults, I disagree. Without knowing there are consequences for actions, children are less motivated to pay attention and do the right thing. Back-sides are not connected to brain tissue. Parents who beat or hit their children on the head are a different animal anyway.
Oct 14, 2009 2:41 PM
Guest :
Hey, there are all kinds of consequences that do not involve corporal punishment. Glad your kids were very bright, but they could have been brighter, according to this research. Don't ignore science, just because you don't like the results -- that's called denial.

Did you know that Sweden is celebrating its 30-year national ban on spanking. It's against the law in Sweden, the very first country to ban smacking kids. Since 1979, when the Swedes started the movement, 24 nations have joined them with laws banning corporal punishment of children. The United States is not one of them. Ethic Soup blog has a good post on this at:

http://www.ethicsoup.com/2009/10/spanking-is-illegal-sweden-celebrates-30ye ar-national-ban-.html

Oct 17, 2009 7:33 AM
Guest :
Child buttock-battering vs. DISCIPLINE:

Child buttock-battering for the purpose of gaining compliance is nothing more than an inherited bad habit.

Its a good idea for people to take a look at what they are doing, and learn how to DISCIPLINE instead of hit.

I think the reason why television shows like "Supernanny" and "Dr. Phil" are so popular is because that is precisely what many (not all) people are trying to do.

There are several reasons why child bottom-slapping isn't a good idea. Here are some good, quick reads recommended by professionals:

Plain Talk About Spanking
by Jordan Riak,

The Sexual Dangers of Spanking Children
by Tom Johnson,

NO VITAL ORGANS THERE, So They Say
by Lesli Taylor M.D. and Adah Maurer Ph.D.

Most compelling of all reasons to abandon this worst of all bad habits is the fact that buttock-battering can be unintentional sexual abuse for some children. There is an abundance of educational resources, testimony, documentation, etc available on the subject that can easily be found by doing a little research with the recommended reads-visit www.nospank.net.

Just a handful of those helping to raise awareness of why child bottom-slapping isn't a good idea:

American Academy of Pediatrics,
American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry,
Center For Effective Discipline,
PsycHealth Ltd Behavioral Health Professionals,
Churches' Network For Non-Violence,
Nobel Peace Prize recipient Archbishop Desmond Tutu,
Parenting In Jesus' Footsteps,
Global Initiative To End All Corporal Punishment of Children,
United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.

In 26 countries, child corporal punishment is prohibited by law (with more in process). In fact, the US was the only UN member that did not ratify the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
Oct 17, 2009 7:33 AM
Guest :
Child buttock-battering vs. DISCIPLINE:

Child buttock-battering for the purpose of gaining compliance is nothing more than an inherited bad habit.

Its a good idea for people to take a look at what they are doing, and learn how to DISCIPLINE instead of hit.

I think the reason why television shows like "Supernanny" and "Dr. Phil" are so popular is because that is precisely what many (not all) people are trying to do.

There are several reasons why child bottom-slapping isn't a good idea. Here are some good, quick reads recommended by professionals:

Plain Talk About Spanking
by Jordan Riak,

The Sexual Dangers of Spanking Children
by Tom Johnson,

NO VITAL ORGANS THERE, So They Say
by Lesli Taylor M.D. and Adah Maurer Ph.D.

Most compelling of all reasons to abandon this worst of all bad habits is the fact that buttock-battering can be unintentional sexual abuse for some children. There is an abundance of educational resources, testimony, documentation, etc available on the subject that can easily be found by doing a little research with the recommended reads-visit www.nospank.net.

Just a handful of those helping to raise awareness of why child bottom-slapping isn't a good idea:

American Academy of Pediatrics,
American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry,
Center For Effective Discipline,
PsycHealth Ltd Behavioral Health Professionals,
Churches' Network For Non-Violence,
Nobel Peace Prize recipient Archbishop Desmond Tutu,
Parenting In Jesus' Footsteps,
Global Initiative To End All Corporal Punishment of Children,
United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.

In 26 countries, child corporal punishment is prohibited by law (with more in process). In fact, the US was the only UN member that did not ratify the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
4 Comments