The consensus of a team of New Hampshire researchers is to never spank a child under any circumstances.
Murray Straus, a sociologist, and Mallie Paschall from the Prevention Research Center in Berkeley, California, led a research study that shows spanking lowers a child’s IQ.
Corporal Punishment by Parents
Spare the rod and spoil the child is often stated by parents to justify spanking. But, could spanking actually be damaging to a child’s ability to learn? New research says yes, it could.
Spanking that leaves a mark may be considered physical child abuse in many states and could result in a parent losing parental rights and even going to jail. But, spanking may also affect children in their ability to learn in school. Murray Straus, leader of the recent University of New Hampshire in Durham study, says, "The practical side of this is that pediatricians and child psychologists need to start doing what none of them do now, and say, ‘Never spank under any circumstances.’" [1]
Spanked Children Have Less Gray Matter
While several studies in the past have alluded to the fact that spanking may reduce intelligence, this new study proclaims it as fact. Spanking creates stress, anxiety and fear and this can slow a child’s cognitive development. It can actually result in fewer neurons in the brain.
The New Hampshire study examined children over a four-year period and divided them into two age groups: 2 to 4 years old and 5 to 9 years old. This was to measure the damage based on age because some psychologists state that spanking does no damage when children are younger. IQ tests were administered as a pretest.
The mothers were questioned on how often they spanked their children. It was revealed that 93% of mothers had spanked younger children once or more per week. 58% had spanked toddlers three or more times a week. A large portion of mothers spanked older children less.
Four years later, the IQ test was administered again. Younger children that had never been spanked scored 5.5 points higher than their spanked peers. In the older age group, the unspanked gained an average of 2 IQ points over the spanked group. The conclusion was made that younger children suffer more damage when spanked.
"It is one of the cruel ironies that younger children are more at risk because their brain is in the most formative part of development," says Straus.
Cognitive Stimulation Is a Factor in Intelligence
The study had a strange twist to it. If a mother gives a child cognitive stimulation in addition to some spanking, the damage to the brain does not seem to be there. Straus says, "Let’s say you have a child that comes from educated parents, warm and supportive parents, who provide cognitive stimulation, and they spank: that kid’s going to be OK anyhow, [though] maybe not quite as OK [as the child would be] if they didn’t spank." [1]
Corporal Punishment by Schools
This now raises the issue of corporal punishment in schools. How can a school justify corporal punishment even with parental permission? Is school not the place for learning to take place? Why create an environment that causes stress, anxiety and fear which reduces the ability to learn?
Hopefully, psychologists and pediatricians will now change their stance on permitting spanking by parents. The evidence is now available to support the elimination of spanking.
The copyright of the article Spanking Has Negative Effect on Intelligence in Educational Issues is owned by Barbara Pytel. Permission to republish Spanking Has Negative Effect on Intelligence in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
Not true -- as a mother and a teacher -- of very bright kids who are very
successful adults, I disagree. Without knowing there are consequences for
actions, children are less motivated to pay attention and do the right
thing. Back-sides are not connected to brain tissue. Parents who beat or
hit their children on the head are a different animal anyway.
Oct 14, 2009 2:41 PM
Guest :
Hey, there are all kinds of consequences that do not involve corporal
punishment. Glad your kids were very bright, but they could have been
brighter, according to this research. Don't ignore science, just because
you don't like the results -- that's called denial.
Did you know
that Sweden is celebrating its 30-year national ban on spanking. It's
against the law in Sweden, the very first country to ban smacking kids.
Since 1979, when the Swedes started the movement, 24 nations have joined
them with laws banning corporal punishment of children. The United States
is not one of them. Ethic Soup blog has a good post on this at:
Child buttock-battering
for the purpose of gaining compliance is nothing more than an inherited bad
habit.
Its a good idea for people to take a look at what they
are doing, and learn how to DISCIPLINE instead of hit.
I think
the reason why television shows like "Supernanny" and "Dr.
Phil" are so popular is because that is precisely what many (not all)
people are trying to do.
There are several reasons why child
bottom-slapping isn't a good idea. Here are some good, quick reads
recommended by professionals:
Plain Talk About Spanking by
Jordan Riak,
The Sexual Dangers of Spanking Children by Tom
Johnson,
NO VITAL ORGANS THERE, So They Say by Lesli Taylor
M.D. and Adah Maurer Ph.D.
Most compelling of all reasons to
abandon this worst of all bad habits is the fact that buttock-battering can
be unintentional sexual abuse for some children. There is an abundance of
educational resources, testimony, documentation, etc available on the
subject that can easily be found by doing a little research with the
recommended reads-visit www.nospank.net.
Just a handful of those
helping to raise awareness of why child bottom-slapping isn't a good
idea:
American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Center For Effective Discipline, PsycHealth Ltd Behavioral Health Professionals, Churches' Network
For Non-Violence, Nobel Peace Prize recipient Archbishop Desmond
Tutu, Parenting In Jesus' Footsteps, Global Initiative To End All
Corporal Punishment of Children, United Nations Convention on the
Rights of the Child.
In 26 countries, child corporal punishment
is prohibited by law (with more in process). In fact, the US was the only
UN member that did not ratify the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
Oct 17, 2009 7:33 AM
Guest :
Child buttock-battering vs. DISCIPLINE:
Child buttock-battering
for the purpose of gaining compliance is nothing more than an inherited bad
habit.
Its a good idea for people to take a look at what they
are doing, and learn how to DISCIPLINE instead of hit.
I think
the reason why television shows like "Supernanny" and "Dr.
Phil" are so popular is because that is precisely what many (not all)
people are trying to do.
There are several reasons why child
bottom-slapping isn't a good idea. Here are some good, quick reads
recommended by professionals:
Plain Talk About Spanking by
Jordan Riak,
The Sexual Dangers of Spanking Children by Tom
Johnson,
NO VITAL ORGANS THERE, So They Say by Lesli Taylor
M.D. and Adah Maurer Ph.D.
Most compelling of all reasons to
abandon this worst of all bad habits is the fact that buttock-battering can
be unintentional sexual abuse for some children. There is an abundance of
educational resources, testimony, documentation, etc available on the
subject that can easily be found by doing a little research with the
recommended reads-visit www.nospank.net.
Just a handful of those
helping to raise awareness of why child bottom-slapping isn't a good
idea:
American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Center For Effective Discipline, PsycHealth Ltd Behavioral Health Professionals, Churches' Network
For Non-Violence, Nobel Peace Prize recipient Archbishop Desmond
Tutu, Parenting In Jesus' Footsteps, Global Initiative To End All
Corporal Punishment of Children, United Nations Convention on the
Rights of the Child.
In 26 countries, child corporal punishment
is prohibited by law (with more in process). In fact, the US was the only
UN member that did not ratify the Convention on the Rights of the Child.